A short and to the point article today. We’ve come a long way since 2001, and today is the day to make further strides in our movement. As always the mainstream media is playing down the sheer magnitude of 9/11 Truth.
However, beginning with Alex Jones’ arrest live on FOX News in New York on Saturday night, this year’s 9/11 anniversary may give the 9/11 Truth Movement some of the biggest publicity it has ever received.
Alex was singled out among a group of around 400 9/11 demonstrators live on Geraldo Rivera’s FOX News show and was arrested and charged for the dubious offence of “operating a sound device without a permit”, a law which violates every American citizen’s First Amendment right to protest.
This happened when Alex and his fellow demonstrators committed the cardinal sin of interrupting Geraldo’s extremely important reports on a scantily clad woman being kicked off a plane and other professional journalism regarding bathroom gay sex which he suggested LIVE ON FOX NEWS that this was something the 9/11 truthers were into. Alex was seen being handcuffed and put into an NYPD squad car live on FOX.
Here’s the full video clips of the incident including a clip of Geraldo putting a finger up to the protesters, clearly showing just exactly what Geraldo Rivera and FOX News think of people like us who don’t conform to their twisted way of thinking concerning the official cover-up story of 9/11:
9/11 Truth Descend On FOX News Live:
Alex Jones being led away by NYPD Live on FOX:
Geraldo Gives 9/11 Truthers The Finger:
Alex Jones Released:
WeAreChange.org along with Alex Jones and his Infowars crew will be at ground zero this morning up until around 2pm so if you live in or around New York then get yourselves down there to show some support.
For the 3,000 people who died on this day six years ago, their families and friends should know that our movement will not stop until the real culprits of this crime are brought to justice.
9/11 was an inside job…and more and more people are beginning to realise it.
Why do we do this? Why do we spend our time running websites, running blogs, writing in-depth articles, making copies of films to show friends and family, going out of our way in conversations to clarify what our world is really like to those who don’t yet see it for what it is? Because we have the facts, we have the evidence and we have the will, passion and desire to let the world know what we know. We are the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Since 2001 the so-called 9/11 “debunkers” have persistently tried to wash away anything that is opposed regarding the official story and anything that disagrees with the 9/11 Commission whitewash. Day after day the deniers keep at it, telling people the world over to shut their mouths and move along. They assume that every single one of us is just some wacked out idiot who likes to spew crap for the fun of it.
It is that fundamental assumption that fails many of those who simply deny everything the 9/11 Truth Movement bring to the table. Some people genuinely believe that anyone who doesn’t wholeheartedly believe the U.S. Government’s version of events on September 11, 2001 is simply insane or just another conspiracy theorist who just desperately wants their version of events to be right to keep that extra sense of excitement in their lives.
The only thing wrong with these arguments is that since the very beginning people didn’t just suddenly start saying “Hey, y’know what? 9/11 was an inside job.” Instead, they had the evidence to back up their claims, which goes against the very definition of the term “conspiracy theorist”.
Want to know why there has never been this major amount of people going round saying they were abducted by aliens last night? Want to know why MILLIONS of people don’t run blogs, websites or organize huge numbers of SERIOUS events and gatherings dedicated to insisting Elvis is still alive?
Because the majority of people aren’t dumb and it takes evidence to convince and assure them. With the events of 9/11, the evidence of an inside job are absolutely conclusive. That is why people are waking up at an enormous rate and why celebrities like Rosie O’Donelll and Charlie Sheen have had the courage to speak out about it at risk of jeapordizing the remainder of their careers.
Have any Hollywood actors come out in recent times making serious comments about the possibility that Elvis Presley may still be out there wandering around in a pair of blue suede shoes? I think not. Yet our movement is constantly tarnished mainly by the mainstream media as being part of that kind of crowd. So many radio hosts now like to play The Twilight Zone theme music whenever anybody questions a western government’s official line of events. This kind of childish avoiding of truth, facts and hard evidence has to end.
High profile deniers are the worst of them all. Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and the like. You can feel sorry for people who are just dumb. You can feel sorry for people who simply don’t realise what is going on in the world because all they watch is mainstream television. You can feel sorry for these people because they haven’t been shown the evidence yet. The likeliness is that if they were to be presented with it their opinions and outlook onlife would change immediately, as happened with myself almost 2 years ago. But the people you cannot feel sorry for are the people who have the facts shoved down their throats every single day, only to brush them off as “outlandish conspiracy theories”.
The New World Order went too far and they have felt the effects in a massive way. The 9/11 Truth Movement is absolutely unprecedented in it’s scope and magnitude. Nobody could have imagined the sheer extent that our movement would grow…and over the coming years I see it happening at a much more accelerated pace.
The mainstream media is living in an alternative world. The mainstream media is slowly dying.
Sean Hannity, if you GENUINELY believe that Osama Bin Laden orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 then you are in deep trouble my friend. The evidence is right in front of you but you refuse to believe it because it scares the hell out of you and rightly so. But here in the 9/11 Truth Movement we refuse to let any kind of fear get in the way of the message we have been sending out loud and clear for the past 5 and a half years…
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!
Trust your instincts, do your own research, draw your own conclusions, because the only conclusion you can come to when you look at what is being offered to you with an open mind is that the attacks of that day didn’t happen the way you thought they did.
The BBC is a shadowy entity indeed. A company that refuses to face facts and refuses to acknowledge that they seem to be able to predict the future.
Alex Jones and Prison Planet’s Paul Joseph Watson were not implying that the BBC were “part of the conspiracy” as you so patronisingly put it, but were making it clear that somebody gave the BBC information about the collapse of building 7 before it happened, lending not just heavily but COMPLETELY towards the fact that the press releases on 9/11 were 100% staged and this one just got put through slightly too early.
Until the BBC reveals just who the hell gave them this information then I will continue to be disgusted with their attitude towards the blatant evidence of the 9/11 cover-up.
Your Conspiracy Files programme was an absolute farce, an absolute travesty and an insult to television itself.
Given what we’ve seen from the BBC recently and given this pathetic comment from “The Editors” it’s almost believable that if you saw someone murdered right in front of you you’d most likely make a programme about it implying that it didn’t really happen and that the people who say otherwise are part of a “conspiracy theorist cult”.
At least the BBC are being consistent. Consistently wrong and blind to the facts. Blind to the truth. Blind to the real culprits of September 11th 2001.
The BBC Building 7 farce lends about as much credibility to the official story of 9/11 as weapons of mass destruction do for justifying the invasion of Iraq
Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
The fiasco of a BBC journalist reporting in advance that Building 7 had collapsed as it loomed large behind her strikes at the very root of how the media were complicit in acting as facilitators for the official myth that was manufactured on 9/11. After this debacle, how can we trust anything we were told about September 11?
Though the video was almost immediately purged by the crowned kings of censorship - Google - it has since been re-uploaded to You Tube and feverishly copied everywhere. Watch the clip below. For an extended clip where the Building 7 farce is clearly annotated, click here, and skip forward to 14 minutes.
A central facet of the debate raging amongst 9/11 truthers and a charge leveled by moronic debunkers is that there is no time code or clock on the video, so how can we verify the BBC reported Building 7’s collapse 20 minutes before it fell?
Does it matter? Does it matter if the BBC reported the collapse 23 minutes before it happened or 30 seconds before it happened? The fact remains that the building is there in the background behind the reporter’s head as she is telling us that it has already collapsed! Don’t get tangled up in this minutia, the building is still standing after she has reported its collapse! Debates about time stamps and time zones are irrelevant.
Others charge that Building 7 was expected to collapse before it did, which is true, and the BBC merely jumped the gun - but that begs the question - how did officials know the building was going to collapse when no modern steel building in history had collapsed from fire damage alone and why were the BBC reporting its collapse in advance with the added knowledge of why it collapsed - a question that is still being investigated by NIST five and a half years later? Whoever the BBC’s source was for reporting the collapse of Building 7 were ahead of NIST by five and a half years and had already determined why the building had collapsed before it had collapsed. Is this not in the least bit suspicious?
What seems obvious is that Silverstein was getting the cover story out as quickly as possible before the building was intentionally demolished, and that’s how they were so sure it was going to collapse before it eventually did. In addition, NYPD officer Craig Bartmer reported hearing bombs tear down the building as he ran away from it.
Debunkers have scoffed at our suggestion that some kind of press release had to have been issued for the BBC to report this ahead of time. Well how else do you suggest the BBC learned of the building’s demise before it happened? A psychic premonition?
This goes to the very heart of why the mainstream media is stuttering and the alternative is burgeoning - the establishment press have become nothing more than ditto heads of the official version of events to the point where they don’t even perform a cursory investigation of what they are being told by official sources. Their role is simply to repeat what the authorities tell them with no scrutiny whatsoever.
Nowhere was this more evident than on 9/11 when the corporate media mechanically relayed the ‘Osama did it’ fraud within hours of the attack, and afforded copious air time to highly suspicious individuals who just happened to know the intricate details of how each building collapsed within minutes of it occurring. This was key to solidifying the dogma of the official story, because anyone who saw the collapse of WTC 7 without having had the official propaganda drilled into them could see plain as day that it was a controlled demolition.
Indeed, controlled demolitions expert Danny Jowenko, unaware that the structure had collapsed on 9/11, immediately concluded that Building 7 had been deliberately demolished when he was shown the footage by a Dutch television crew, and maintains that position to this day.
The BBC Building 7 fiasco lends about as much credibility to the official story of 9/11 as weapons of mass destruction do for the justification of invading Iraq.
Besides the advance reporting of just the collapse itself, how could the news anchor tell us the reason for the collapse before it happened?
“This was not the result of a new attack,” states the anchor, “It was because the building had been weakened during this morning’s attacks.”
How else could the BBC have relayed this information unless by way of some kind of press release or official statement by Silverstein, Giuliani or the NYFD? Who told them that the building had been weakened? In effect, the BBC were working to a 9/11 script and made the error of orating their lines too early.
This damning video is also a commentary on the credibility and impartiality of the BBC as a whole, especially in light of their ludicrously bias, slanted and error ridden Conspiracy Files hit piece that aired last Sunday. Perhaps debunker-in-chief Guy Smith can explain to us how his colleague prophesied the downfall of a building that, almost mockingly, appears in full view behind her head before the live feed is conveniently interrupted.
24 hours after the video first surfaced and was then unceremoniously “pulled” from Google Video (but not before it went viral everywhere else), there is still no response from the BBC and no mainstream coverage whatsoever, not even a ‘look what the silly conspiracy theorists are saying’ puff piece.
It seems our noble press whores are more concerned today about Helen Mirren eating a beef burger and James Cameron’s fictional Jesus tomb.
What if we had unearthed footage of a CNN anchor reporting the collapse of the twin towers as he stood below them? Would that be enough to provoke any interest? How about Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld announcing a joint press conference in which they admit they ran the attack? No doubt the noisy negativists would find some harebrained reason to dismiss that also.
Where is the BBC’s clarification on this? How about Industrial Risk Insurers, surely they would be interested to find out that Silverstein was rapaciously anticipating their $861 million payout before Building 7 “accidentally” collapsed?
Our sense of outrage on this matter should not be quelled by time and the stubbornness of official channels, namely the BBC and whoever their source for reporting the collapse was, to answer for, in the case of the BBC, their hideous “mistake,” and the source for exactly how they were able to predict that a modern steel building that had suffered limited fire damage would suddenly collapse in its own footprint without the aid of explosive demolition.
Revealing, shocking video shows reporter talking about collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background, Google removes clip
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 (UPDATED 5:36AM CST)
An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.
Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies.
This amazing clip was on Google Video (now back again here ), but was removed within hours of the story breaking. However, hundreds of people had already managed to download the clip and it has gone viral on the Internet and the censors won’t be able to shut the lid this time. A You Tube upload is available here but we fully expect this to be removed soon. You can watch it for the time being at this link and also here . A WMV link is here (on our server) and a Quicktime here . Bit torrent versions of the file can be found here . An avi version can be found here .
To be clear, the Salomon Brothers Building is just a different name for Building 7 or WTC 7. Skip forward to around the 14:30 minute mark.
Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot.
Here are some further screenshots from the video.
The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building’s structure.
As we have documented before, firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down. It is widely acknowledged by those who were there on the scene that warnings were issued for people to evacuate the area in anticipation of the building’s collapse, with some even stating that a 20 second countdown preceded the collapse of the 47-story skyscraper, again clearly suggesting that it was taken down by means of explosives as the video footage of its implosion illustrates.
Alex Jones’ film Terror Storm documents how Thermate was the likely culprit for the implosion of the twin towers and also explores the collapse of WTC 7.
In a September 2002 PBS documentary, the owner of the WTC complex Larry Silverstein discusses Building 7 and states that in the late afternoon of September 11, the decision was made to “pull it.” The term “pull it” is industry jargon for controlled demolition, but Silverstein denied charges that WTC 7 had been deliberately brought down.
This newly uncovered video confirms that the collapse of WTC 7 was no surprise, because television news stations were reporting on it before it happened!
This footage is absolutely amazing and should provoke a firestorm of new questions aimed both at Silverstein and the BBC. Who told the BBC that the building was going to collapse before it did and why were they reporting its fall in advance of the event actually taking place?
Many have speculated that some kind of press release was leaked too soon and AP wires, radio stations and TV news outlets prematurely reported on WTC 7’s collapse.
The video also severely undermines the credibility of the BBC who recently caused controversy by airing a 9/11 hit piece that sought to debunk questions that bring the official story into doubt.
Calls have already been put through to the BBC reporting the “mistake,” click here to listen to an MP3. The BBC have promised to “look into it.”
Moronic commenters on Digg are already trying to bury the story, yet none of them have an answer as to why the BBC reported the building’s collapse before it happened. Click here to add your own comment and counter the debunkers.
ACTION: E Mail the BBC and ask them to clarify exactly why their reporter is announcing the collapse of Building 7 before it has collapsed.
Add Christine Ebersole to the list of kooks who say the 9/11 terror attacks were an inside job.
The “Grey Gardens” star went on writer John Conner’s radio show the other night to say she agrees with him that a corrupt faction within the U.S. government is to blame.
“I think we want to look at our government as sort of like a benevolent father that’s going to take care of us and be kind to us and treat us well, and I think it’s too much for our people to conceptualize, and I’m sure that’s what happened to people in Nazi Germany,” Ebersole said.
Professor says there is no doubt infamous Bin Laden tape is fake, being used to deflect 9/11 “conspiracy theories”
Steve Watson Infowars.net
Monday, February 19, 2007
A leading expert on Osama Bin Laden has officially gone on the record saying that he believes the so called “9/11 Confession” tape, released shortly after the attacks, is an outright fake that has been used by US intelligence agencies to deflect attention from “conspiracy theories†about 9/11.
Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies program, joined Kevin Barrett last Friday on his radio show (gcnlive.com, 2/16/2007, first hour) in his first public interview since comments he made last year indicating that he believes Bin Laden may be dead and that many of the newer tapes are either fake or consist of old audio and video.
The “Confession” video, played ad infinitum in the wake of the attack on Afghanistan in December 2001, was magically found in a house in Jalalabad after anti-Taliban forces moved in. It featured a fat Osama laughing and joking about how he’d carried out 9/11. The video was also mistranslated in order to manipulate viewer opinion and featured “Bin Laden” praising two of the hijackers, only he got their names wrong.
This Osama also uses the wrong hand to write with and wears gold rings, a practice totally in opposition to the Muslim faith.
Despite the fact that the man in the video looks nothing like Bin Laden, the CIA stood by the video whilst many, including Professor Lawrence now, have declared it an outright fake.
Lawrence is the author of a book entitled Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama Bin Laden, which translates Bin Laden’s writing. In January 2006 he told ABC news that a newly released audio tape was missing several key elements and “was like a voice from the grave”. The Professor had analyzed more than 20 complete speeches and interviews of the al Qaida leader for his book, and, while the CIA confirmed the voice on the tape as Bin Laden, Lawrence questioned when it was recorded and declared the timing of its release as politically convenient.
Last Friday Lawrence, citing informants in the US intelligence apparatus’s Bin Laden units, told Kevin Barrett that everyone knows the tape is fake, adding that the hoax has been kept alive because it is politically useful to those who wish to bolster the official 9/11 conspiracy that 19 hijackers directed by Bin Laden from a cave carried out the attacks.
We have previously covered the scores of times Osama Bin Laden has been used as a tool of fear and control as a tried and tested method whenever the going gets tough. Many tapes have been determined to be total fakes by voice analysis or simply re-hashes of old material.
Research led us to discover that the most recent “Al Qaeda” video releases featuring Bin Laden had already featured in a docudrama The Road to Guantanamo. The media tentatively even admitted that it was the government that released the tapes.
In a separate revelation, AP reported that an expert on Islamic extremism deemed the Al Qaeda footage as so out of character for al-Qa’ida it could have been taken by a security agency.
Bin Laden was created by US intelligence , worked with US intelligence in the late 70s and 80s, was used as a patsy by US intelligence before and after 911 and is now being used as a manipulative tool of fear by the criminal elite faction currently in power in the US.
In June 2006, Muckraker Report investigative reporter Ed Haas contacted the FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden’s wanted page on the FBI website.
“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” he was told Rex Tomb.
In Bin Laden’s first interview after the 9/11 attacks he denied any involvement. This isn’t like a kid caught thieving in a sweet shop - terrorists always claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated otherwise why bother killing people to send a political message?
Then came the now thoroughly debunked “Confession Tape”.
The fact that the FBI does not consider the ‘confession tape’ as reliable evidence of involvement in 9/11 was subsequently completely dismissed by the Washington Post and others who still say the tape proves that Al-Qaeda have, “proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings.”
Comments(0)
